In the long road of years that we have
undertaken in the world of blockchain and cryptocurrencies, we have found a
recurring theme, which apparently is a vice that comes from something older
than the original idea of these projects.
In many societies, the state, pretended to
make us believe that citizens were and are unable to protect their interests,
and this incapacity could only be covered by superior beings, called in ancient
times wise, touched by the grace of the gods, in the Currently, these are
social protection institutions, which, for example, protect the worker from
himself, keeping and controlling social benefits, since if they receive it,
they will not be able to manage it.
In closer cases, there is traditional
banking, where not long ago, a specific surname was required, or the membership
of a defined club, which would allow the foundation of a bank, taken to
extremes in the form of banking associations and other, where they come to
demand the incorporation of people with "trajectory" within the work
team, because otherwise, there could be a disaster, since more nobody knows
about that topic.
All these aberrations of the financial
system, were those that the cryptocurrencies in their fundamental objective,
wanted to abolish, to remove from the control of few the control of the
personal finances of each and every one of us.
So much so, that as a fable or reality its
founder disappears from the map once the birth of this new technology is
consolidated.
But the customs of the past, seem to have
remained, today, for each new venture is necessary to have a group of
"experts" in the field. A group of self-anointed advisors in super
beings, who for the few who have not tried to innovate in this area, will see
that the cost is not low, at least we are talking about 5% of the company that
will be in the hands of these people, which do not work for contribution to the
technology, if not, they have a price, that if you do not cover it, it happens
that the market will not accept you.
the projects are evaluated by the
associated work team, it does not seem bad, but how many Ponzi schemes have
been made in front of these supposed advisors, or those advisors did not share
a cubicle with which today they talk about a speculative bubble, they are
experts who are in favor, not against?
The market requires new methods of
evaluation, more individual responsibility in the evaluation of projects and
ICOs, we can not expect everything to be chewed and protected by a superior
being to be held responsible for, we must be able to evaluate and assume our
risks.
This new era requires us not to change the
old actors for new ones that do the same game, and create the same club to
which very few will be invited, unless they pay the membership, we can not just
change one for another, we must change the scheme and assume total control of
our decisions based on our evaluation, and not the evaluation of a third party,
which sometimes does not even evaluate, only charges for it.
Comments
Post a Comment